Method | Param | Ref Simul | Strong selection | Light selection | Light selection |
---|
| QTL | 0.25 | | | 0.5 |
|
N
e
| 100 | | | |
|
N
g
| 50 | | | |
|
N
s
| 20 | | | |
|
N
p
| 100 | | | |
|
dens
| 0.25 | | | |
|
sel
| No selection | sel = 0.5 | sel = 0.8 | sel = 0.8 |
HaploMax | | 2.018 | 3.403 | 3.125 | 3.103 |
HAPimLDL | | 2.165 | 3.306 | 3.151 | 3.124 |
- Square roots of MSE values (in cM) for both methods in the presence of phenotypic selection; we assumed complete linkage disequilibrium between the QTL and the markers and linkage equilibrium between the markers in the founder population. The haplotype is composed of the QTL and two flanking markers; the true QTL position is 3.35 cM on a 10-cM long chromosomal region; unspecified parameters are equal to the corresponding parameters in the reference simulation; in this table, QTL denotes the QTL allelic effect value, N
e
is the effective size of the population, N
g
is the number of generations, N
s
is the number of sires, N
p
is the number of progeny per sire, dens is the marker density and sel denotes the selection parameter; each scenario was simulated 500 times