Skip to main content

Table 3 Increase in accuracy comparing MT to ST models for trait 1

From: Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods

  

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

  

11

2

3

4

1

2

2

3

4

Model

rg

1&22

1&2

no

no

1&2

1

no

no

no

 

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

A

0.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.00

 

0.75

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.01

0.01

 

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

G

0.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.01

0.01

 

0.75

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.02

0.01

 

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

BCπ0

0.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.02

 

0.75

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.02

0.03

BSSVS

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

-0.01

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.01

0.02

 

0.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.02

 

0.75

0.00

0.00

0.00

-0.01

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.03

0.03

  1. Differences are for scenarios 1 and 2 across generations and different values of the genetic correlation (rg) between both traits
  2. 1Generations 1, 2, 3 and 4; 2animals with phenotypes for: both traits (1&2), only trait 1 (1) or neither of the traits (no)