Skip to main content

Table 2 Evidence for quantitative trait loci (QTL) for carcass cuts, chemical body composition, lipid accretion and feed intake on pig chromosome X

From: Genomic scan for quantitative trait loci of chemical and physical body composition and deposition on pig chromosome X including the pseudoautosomal region of males

Trait1

LR2

Pos (CI)3

% Var4

a ± SE5

d ± SE5

Carcass characteristics – dissected carcass cuts

Entire loin weight (g)

11.56**

7 (0–27)

3.7

283.8 ± 82.7

-

Loin weight without external fat (g)

7.68a

11 (0–33)

2.5

184.5 ± 66.1

-

Jowl weight (g)

17.91**

128.4 (106–128.4)

5.8

57.4 ± 37.6

216.9 ± 74.3

Chemical body composition and accretion rates

Lipid cont. empty body, 30 kg (%)

10.38a

83 (68–108)

3.3

-0.496 ± 0.259

1.705 ± 0.532

Protein cont. empty body, 30 kg (%)

10.43a

83 (68–109)

3.8

0.011 ± 0.006

-0.038 ± 0.012

Protein cont. FFSEB, 30 kg (%)

9.36a

82 (59–128.4)

3.1

-0.093 ± 0.046

0.285 ± 0.095

LAR 90–120 g (g/day)

9.60*

128.4 (78–128.4)

3.2

26.7 ± 8.5

-

Daily gain, feed intake and food conversion ratio

DFI 120–140 g (g/day)

7.00a

56 (36–83)

2.3

101.6 ± 38.2

-

  1. 1Traits of FFSEB, LAR and DFI denote fat-free substance of the empty body, lipid accretion rate, daily feed intake, respectively
  2. 2LR represents likelihood ratio values and superscript aimplies a suggestive QTL at the 10% chromosome-wide level, whereas * and ** imply significant QTL at the 5% or 1% chromosome-wide levels, respectively
  3. 3Positions of the QTL in cM based on the USDA reference map and confidence intervals (CI) in brackets
  4. 4Percentages of F2 variance explained by the QTL calculated as the proportion of residual variances due to the QTL effect on the residual variances excluding the QTL effect
  5. 5Estimated additive (a) and dominance (d) effects and their standard errors (SE); estimates in bold represent significant additive or dominance effects