Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of five fine-mapping methods in drift and a 5 cM segment.

From: Linear models for joint association and linkage QTL mapping

Method

Bias

 

MSE

 

LA

0.29

(0.15)

2.22

(0.22)

LDLA

0.06

(0.08)

0.67

(0.09)

LD decay

0.11

(0.08)

0.69

(0.10)

Two-marker

0.13

(0.08)

0.66

(0.10)

IBD

0.34

(0.08)

0.78

(0.15)

  1. Bias and mean square error (in cM and cM2) (with standard errors) of five fine-mapping methods: linkage analysis, joint association and linkage analysis, linkage disequilibrium decay, two-marker association, and an IBD method. The scenario is drift and a 5 cM segment spanned with 21 SNP markers.
Back to article page

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686