Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of five fine-mapping methods in drift and a 20 cM segment.

From: Linear models for joint association and linkage QTL mapping

Method

Bias

 

MSE

 

LA

0.51

(0.44)

19.61

(2.89)

LDLA

-0.18

(0.26)

7.06

(1.65)

LD decay

-0.12

(0.24)

5.68

(1.52)

Two-marker

-0.05

(0.24)

5.89

(1.41)

IBD

1.20

(0.19)

5.14

(1.51)

  1. Bias and mean square error (in cM and cM2) (with standard errors) of five fine-mapping methods: linkage analysis, joint association and linkage analysis, linkage disequilibrium decay, two-marker association, and an IBD method. The scenario is drift and a 20 cM segment spanned with 21 SNP markers.
Back to article page

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686