Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of five fine-mapping methods in admixture and a 5 cM segment.

From: Linear models for joint association and linkage QTL mapping

Method

Bias

 

MSE

 

LA

0.42

(0.14)

2.06

(0.21)

LDLA

0.31

(0.14)

2.15

(0.23)

LD decay

0.31

(0.14)

2.02

(0.21)

Two-marker

0.16

(0.13)

1.82

(0.18)

IBD

0.23

(0.13)

1.69

(0.20)

  1. Bias and mean square error (in cM and cM2) (with standard errors) of five fine-mapping methods: linkage analysis, joint association and linkage analysis, linkage disequilibrium decay, two-marker association, and an IBD method. The scenario is admixture and a 5 cM segment spanned with 21 SNP markers.
Back to article page

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686