Table 2 Estimates of QTL allele substitution effect (
), location and efficiency of selection in BC1 and BC4 when frequency of favourable QTL allele in donor line varied and N = 1000 (se are in italic font).
), location and efficiency of selection in BC1 and BC4 when frequency of favourable QTL allele in donor line varied and N = 1000 (se are in italic font).From: Combined detection and introgression of QTL in outbred populations
α b |
| Locationc | Efficiency of selection | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC1 | BC4 | BC1 | BC4 | BC1 | BC4 | |
p(Q d ) = 1.00 | ||||||
2.23 | 2.23 ± 0.02 | 2.21 ± 0.01 | 84.8 ± 0.1 | 85.0 ± 0.0 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 |
1.48 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 1.47 ± 0.01 | 85.1 ± 0.2 | 85.0 ± 0.1 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 |
1.02 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 83.0 ± 1.5 | 82.8 ± 1.5 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.00 |
p(Q d ) = 0.90 | ||||||
2.23 | 2.04 ± 0.02 | 2.00 ± 0.01 | 85.0 ± 0.1 | 85.1 ± 0.1 | 0.90 ± 0.00 | 0.90 ± 0.00 |
1.48 | 1.35 ± 0.02 | 1.32 ± 0.01 | 84.8 ± 0.2 | 84.9 ± 0.1 | 0.89 ± 0.00 | 0.89 ± 0.00 |
1.02 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 85.1 ± 0.4 | 85.0 ± 0.1 | 0.89 ± 0.00 | 0.88 ± 0.00 |
p(Q d ) = 0.75 | ||||||
2.23 | 1.67 ± 0.02 | 1.64 ± 0.01 | 84.9 ± 0.3 | 85.0 ± 0.1 | 0.75 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.00 |
1.48 | 1.12 ± 0.02 | 1.09 ± 0.01 | 84.9 ± 0.3 | 85.1 ± 0.1 | 0.74 ± 0.00 | 0.73 ± 0.00 |
1.02 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0.76 ± 0.01 | 84.1 ± 0.7 | 84.9 ± 0.2 | 0.72 ± 0.01 | 0.72 ± 0.00 |
p(Q d ) = 0.50 | ||||||
2.23 | 1.14 ± 0.02 | 1.09 ± 0.01 | 84.3 ± 0.5 | 85.0 ± 0.1 | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 0.49 ± 0.00 |
1.48 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.72 ± 0.01 | 82.3 ± 0.2 | 85.0 ± 0.2 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.48 ± 0.01 |
1.02 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 81.2 ± 1.4 | 85.2 ± 0.4 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.01 |