Skip to main content

Table 2 QTL results from the joint design and back fat

From: Joint QTL analysis of three connected F2-crosses in pigs

SSC

Position

CIa

F-value

p add b

p dom c

p imp d

Order of effectse

1

90

[59.3; 95.8]

3.11

0.0195

0.0762

0.1062

â P > â M > â W

1

144

[126.3; 149.6]

6.81

<0.0001

0.0889

0.2779

â P > â M > â W

1

179

[149.6; 209.1]

2.80

0.0101

0.1010

0.5290

â M > â P = â W

2

13

[0.0; 39.9]

5.01

0.0058

0.5031

<0.0001

â M > â P = â W

2

77

[68.0; 81.0]

5.79

<0.0001

0.1947

0.3441

â P > â M > â W

6

100

[96.4; 101.2]

6.46

<0.0001

0.0275

0.0587

â M > â P = â W

7

83

[75.5; 100.9]

5.81

<0.0001

0.0593

0.0422

â W > â M = â P

11

83

[61.0; 93.3]

2.77

0.0094

0.1511

0.0939

â P > â M = â W

12

58

[0.0; 84.1]

3.37

0.2599

0.0006

0.2458

â M = â P = â W

13

56

[39.2; 81.2]

2.34

0.3950

0.0134

0.1595

â M = â P = â W

14

51

[27.5; 60.7]

3.05

0.0107

0.0332

0.0802

â M = â P > â W

17

74

[43.6; 97.9]

2.26

0.0199

0.9068

0.0267

â M > â P = â W

18

27

[10.9; 43.6]

4.38

<0.0001

0.0251

0.2384

â M = â P > â W

  1. a confidence interval; b comparison-wise error probability for additive effects; c comparison-wise error probability for dominant effects; d comparison-wise error probability for imprinting effects; e â P estimated effect of Pietrain breed, â M estimated effect of Meishan breed, â W estimated effect of the wild boar breed