Skip to main content

Table 3 Increase in accuracy comparing MT to ST models for trait 1

From: Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods

   Scenario 1 Scenario 2
   11 2 3 4 1 2 2 3 4
Model rg 1&22 1&2 no no 1&2 1 no no no
  0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02 -0.01 -0.01
A 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
  0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.01
  0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
G 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01
  0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.01
  0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02
BCπ0 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02
  0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.03
BSSVS 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02
  0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02
  0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.03
  1. Differences are for scenarios 1 and 2 across generations and different values of the genetic correlation (rg) between both traits
  2. 1Generations 1, 2, 3 and 4; 2animals with phenotypes for: both traits (1&2), only trait 1 (1) or neither of the traits (no)