Skip to main content

Table 4 The regression of replicate mean WEC on time for flocks in Scenario 5

From: Adaptation of gastrointestinal nematode parasites to host genotype: single locus simulation models

Mechanism of the A allele

Frequency of the A allele (x)

Flock average WEC (epg)

Regression coefficient (epg/yr)

∆p

Year 1

Year 20

Estimate

s.e.

E

0.0

710

710

0.72

0.87

 

E

0.1

640

670

3.21

0.80

Decrease

E

0.2

540

510

−1.07

0.58

 

E

0.3

470

500

2.08

0.50

Decrease

E

0.4

380

430

1.16

0.45

 

E

0.5

340

340

−0.17

0.50

 

E

0.6

290

300

0.39

0.36

 

E

0.7

250

260

1.02

0.37

 

E

0.8

210

230

1.62

0.26

Increase

E

0.9

180

220

1.83

0.18

Increase

E

1.0

140

190

2.54

0.20

Increase

M

0.0

720

800

2.94

0.56

Decrease

M

0.1

640

650

1.22

0.65

 

M

0.2

580

620

2.39

0.66

 

M

0.3

500

480

−0.08

0.62

 

M

0.4

440

440

−0.89

0.54

 

M

0.5

370

370

−1.40

0.43

 

M

0.6

340

350

1.81

0.39

Increase

M

0.7

290

310

1.07

0.27

Increase

M

0.8

260

320

3.62

0.24

Increase

M

0.9

220

300

4.35

0.30

Increase

M

1.0

180

290

5.53

0.29

Increase

F

0.0

720

800

2.94

0.56

Decrease

F

0.1

660

660

0.10

0.80

 

F

0.2

570

540

−1.13

0.58

 

F

0.3

480

520

4.02

0.63

Decrease

F

0.4

410

430

−0.52

0.53

 

F

0.5

360

340

0.08

0.53

 

F

0.6

310

320

−0.69

0.47

 

F

0.7

250

240

−0.33

0.45

 

F

0.8

230

210

0.55

0.37

 

F

0.9

180

170

−0.30

0.29

 

F

1.0

140

170

0.99

0.16

Increase

  1. Postulated mechanisms to reduce WEC in sheep through the ‘resistance’ A allele: E = reduced worm establishment, M = increased worm mortality and F = reduced female worm fecundity; epg = eggs per gram; s h = 25%; s p = 10%; bold characters = coefficients significantly different to zero (P < 0.001) with the directional change in frequency for the alternate B allele in worms (∆p).