Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Selected regions and their posterior inclusion probabilities, using different interval sizes

From: Concordance analysis for QTL detection in dairy cattle: a case study of leg morphology

  40 markers 30 markers 20 markers 10 markers
QTL chr start end ∑p40 rank ∑p30 ∑p30/∑p40 rank ∑p20 ∑p20/∑p40 rank ∑p10 ∑p10/∑p40
1 23 46.1 48.2 1.72 1 1.55 0.90 1 1.09 0.63 7 0.75 0.44
2 5 109.6 111.7 1.45 2 1.21 0.83 7 0.93 0.64 24 0.57 0.39
3 19 47.7 49.8 1.31 3 1.19 0.91 2 1.02 0.78 3 0.83 0.63
4 14 66.3 69.4 1.31 4 1.15 0.88 4 0.98 0.75 9 0.73 0.56
5 3 98.6 100.7 1.27 12 0.99 0.78 8 0.90 0.71 15 0.62 0.49
6 19 60.3 62.5 1.23 7 1.09 0.89 18 0.79 0.64 18 0.60 0.49
7 1 146.6 148.2 1.23 15 0.97 0.79 13 0.85 0.69 23 0.57 0.46
8 15 29.5 31.3 1.22 8 1.08 0.89 6 0.94 0.77 35 0.50 0.41
9 13 46.5 48.4 1.21 16 0.96 0.79 31 0.67 0.55 40 0.46 0.38
10 6 87.2 90.3 1.21 10 1.01 0.83 25 0.74 0.61 32 0.51 0.42
11 10 74.9 78.2 1.19 5 1.11 0.93 3 1.02 0.86 1 0.85 0.71
12 29 6.6 9.1 1.19 9 1.01 0.85 9 0.90 0.76 14 0.62 0.52
13 11 104.6 107.0 1.17 6 1.09 0.93 5 0.97 0.83 2 0.84 0.72
14 19 23.9 26.0 1.16 14 0.97 0.84 23 0.76 0.66 19 0.59 0.51
15 26 21.8 24.3 1.14 21 0.94 0.82 17 0.81 0.71 16 0.61 0.54
16 23 24.2 27.8 1.12 23 0.93 0.83 22 0.76 0.68 21 0.57 0.51
17 28 30.8 33.9 1.10 11 0.99 0.90 10 0.89 0.81 4 0.78 0.71
18 8 96.5 98.8 1.10 22 0.93 0.85 28 0.71 0.65 26 0.55 0.50
19 3 40.6 43.2 1.10 20 0.95 0.86 14 0.85 0.77 8 0.74 0.67
20 18 14.0 16.8 1.08 24 0.93 0.86 20 0.77 0.71 12 0.63 0.58
  1. The 20 QTL with the largest sum of posterior inclusion probabilities (∑p) and their location in Mb, ranked based on their ∑p considering an interval size of 40 markers (~2.5 Mb), and their rank and ∑p if smaller intervals of 30 (~1.9 Mb), 20 (~1.3 Mb) or 10 (~0.6 Mb) are used.