Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance comparison of seven prediction methods in seven training scenarios for line W1

From: Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines using non-linear regression models

 

Training data

Model

B1

B2

W1

B1 + B2

B1 + W1

B2 + W1

B1 + B2 + W1

GBLUP1

-0.241

-0.115

0.547

-0.280

0.532

0.544

0.532

RRPCA1

-0.176

-0.177

0.551

-0.250

0.532

0.549

0.532

MTGBLUP

0.154

0.155

0.547

0.253

0.559

0.536

0.551

Poly

0.205

0.189

0.515

0.298

0.520

0.515

0.520

PolyPCA

0.207

0.190

0.515

0.299

0.521

0.515

0.521

RBF

-0.206

-0.089

0.530

-0.212

0.530

0.530

0.530

RBFPCA

-0.171

-0.149

0.540

-0.235

0.540

0.540

0.540

  1. The predictive correlation is computed as the correlation coefficient of the predicted value and phenotype of line W1; GBLUP: genome-enabled best linear unbiased prediction; RRPCA: ridge regression principal component analysis; MTGBLUP: multi-trait GBLUP; Poly: polynomial kernel based linear models; RBF: radial basis function kernel based linear models; RR/Poly/RBF-PCA: the model with the features reduced by PCA.
  2. Approximated SE across the genomic prediction models and training data sets ranged from 0.045-0.060.
  3. 1Results are presented by Calus et al. [22].