Skip to main content

Table 3 Chromosome-wise SNPs significantly associated with the IgAt trait as identified by the GWAS

From: Detection and replication of QTL underlying resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in adult sheep using the ovine 50K SNP array

OARa

SNP name

SNP position (Mb)b

Allele substitution effect trait units (SD units)c, d

Nominal P-value

Corrected Pc-value (Pg-value)e

TGI (Mb)f

8

OAR8_53084022.1

49,525,147

0.325 ± 0.075 (0.417)

2.04E−05

0.02

49.40–49.65

8

s42819.1

72,402,305

0.190 ± 0.045 (0.243)

3.77E−05

0.037

72.27–72.52

10

s56461.1

17,012,728

0.221 ± 0.050 (0.283)

1.51E−05

0.013

16.88–17.13

10

OAR10_23921485.1

24,187,107

0.203 ± 0.048 (0.260)

2.63E−05

0.022

24.06–24.31

10

s61799.1

30,924,195

0.210 ± 0.051 (0.269)

5.41E−05

0.045

30.79–31.04

11

DU232778_232.1

32,492,623

0.203 ± 0.048 (0.26)

3.74E−05

0.036

32.36–32.61

12

s68938.1

61,866,746

0.233 ± 0.047 (0.299)

1.28E−06

0.001 (0.033)

61.74–61.99

14

OAR14_21336208.1

20,773,096

0.284 ± 0.070 (0.364)

6.75E−05

0.041

20.64–20.89

15

s75729.1

24,870,677

0.266 ± 0.059 (0.341)

8.33E−06

0.007

24.74–24.99

25

s21640.1

13,152,201

0.224 ± 0.056 (0.287)

9.09E−05

0.048

13.02–13.27

  1. a OAR ovine chromosome
  2. bPosition of the significant SNP identified by the GWAS analysis based on the Oar_v3.1 version of the Ovine Genome Assembly (http://www.ensembl.org/Ovis_aries/Info/Index)
  3. c, dMagnitude of the allele substitution effect, and standard error, in trait units (Yield Deviations of IgAt) and in phenotypic standard deviations (SD) units (in brackets)
  4. eCorrected P-values at the 5 % chromosome-wise level (and 5 % genome-wise level) obtained after applying a Bonferroni correction considering the number of independent markers analyzed for each chromosome and for the whole genome, respectively
  5. f TGI Target genomic interval defined for the GWAS significant associations as 250 Kb long intervals centered on the significant SNP. The genes within that interval were extracted as positional candidate genes. In this case, none of these genes was identified as functional candidate by the candidate gene survey performed