Detection and validation of structural variations in bovine whole-genome sequence data

Table 5 Comparison of the TWICE_SEQ and MERGE sets for 21 twice-sequenced individuals

Animal ID	MERGE	OVERLAP	SHARE	Overlap%	Coverage
HOLFRAM268	845	27	15	55.56	21.32
HOLFRAM266	1896	1635	1041	63.67	14.25
HOLNLDM273	1796	1913	1176	65.48	15.34
HOLNLDM270	1677	2069	1136	67.74	15.51
HOLDNKM259	1682	2001	1146	68.13	15.74
HOLUSAM277	2219	2398	1524	68.68	17.62
HOLNLDM272	2039	2520	1410	69.15	16.91
HOLDEUM255	1881	2168	1341	71.29	17.02
HOLUSAM280	2000	2200	1440	72.00	17.55
HOLNLDM274	690	1585	497	72.03	14.78
HOLDNKM262	980	2537	714	72.86	17.4
HOLDNKM261	1969	1867	1361	72.90	15.84
HOLUSAM278	1011	3067	761	75.27	18.96
HOLDNKM260	2557	1305	986	75.56	16.93
HOLDEUM256	1059	2730	806	76.11	17.48
HOLSWEM275	1214	2882	926	76.28	18.86
HOLUSAM279	1331	2581	1036	77.84	16.75
HOLDNKM263	1159	2697	916	79.03	17.02
HOLDEUM257	1356	3626	1087	80.16	21.53
HOLCANM253	1600	257	255	99.22	42.71
HOLUSAM276	845	132	131	99.24	16.89

MERGE and OVERLAP represent the counts of SV that were observed by using the merge and overlap method, respectively. SHARE represents the counts of SV that were found by both methods. The overlap percentage is equal to SHARE counts divided by the smaller number found in the merge and overlap method. Coverage is the sum of the coverages for each twice-sequenced individual

ISSN: 1297-9686