Table 3 Correlations between EBV for milk yield of buck sires of the recorded goats in Saanen
LACT | \({\text{SUM}}\_{\text{leg}}4\) | \({\text{PERS}}\_{\text{leg}}4\) | \({\text{a}}_{0} \_{\text{leg}}4\) | \({\text{a}}_{1} \_{\text{leg}}4\) | \({\text{SUM}}\_{\text{leg}}1\) | \({\text{a}}_{0} \_{\text{leg}}1\) | \({\text{a}}_{1} \_{\text{leg}}1\) | \({\text{SUM}}\_{\text{leg}}4{\text{R}}2\) | \({\text{b}}_{1} \_{\text{leg}}4{\text{R}}2\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({\text{SUM}}\_{\text{leg}}4\) | 0.99 | |||||||||
\({\text{PERS}}\_{\text{leg}}4\) | 0.06 | 0.15 | ||||||||
\({\text{a}}_{0} \_{\text{leg}}4\) | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.15 | |||||||
\({\text{a}}_{1} \_{\text{leg}}4\) | 0.11 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.20 | ||||||
\({\text{SUM}}\_{\text{leg}}1\) | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.20 | |||||
\({\text{a}}_{0} \_{\text{leg}}1\) | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 1.00 | ||||
\({\text{a}}_{1} \_{\text{leg}}1\) | 0.10 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 0.19 | |||
\({\text{SUM}}\_{\text{leg}}4{\text{R}}2\) | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.19 | ||
\({\text{b}}_{1} \_{\text{leg}}4{\text{R}}2\) | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 1.00 | |
\({\text{b}}_{2} \_{\text{leg}}4{\text{R}}2\) | − 0.10 | − 0.01 | 0.98 | − 0.01 | 0.97 | − 0.01 | − 0.01 | 0.97 | − 0.01 | 0.02 |