Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression coefficients of predictive values for testing cows on observed phenotypes when fitting multiple kernel learning, multilayer BayesB, and partial least squares (PLS) using repeated random sub-sampling cross-validation

From: Integrating genomic and infrared spectral data improves the prediction of milk protein composition in dairy cattle

Traits

Kernel

BayesB

PLS

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M7

M1

M2

M3

M4

M1

M2

M3

M4

M7

True protein nitrogen

1.04

0.92

0.91

0.94

0.90

0.93

0.94

0.96

0.92

0.91

0.93

0.87

0.89

0.87

0.92

0.88

Total casein

1.02

1.01

1.01

1.01

1.01

1.00

1.01

0.98

0.97

0.96

0.99

0.98

0.98

0.97

0.97

0.98

Total whey protein

1.01

0.83

0.81

0.87

0.81

0.86

0.86

0.96

0.85

0.82

0.90

0.82

0.77

0.74

0.72

0.75

\(\kappa \text {-}\)casein

1.02

0.76

0.74

0.84

0.85

0.85

0.79

0.92

0.84

0.82

0.92

0.76

0.71

0.71

0.75

0.73

\(\beta \text {-}\)casein

1.12

0.78

0.78

0.92

0.93

0.94

0.86

0.97

0.84

0.82

0.96

0.83

0.83

0.86

0.85

0.84

\(\alpha _{S1}\text {-}\)casein

1.05

0.86

0.86

0.88

0.87

0.88

0.86

1.02

0.87

0.86

0.92

0.84

0.86

0.90

0.82

0.80

\(\alpha _{S2}\text {-}\)casein

1.02

0.84

0.83

0.83

0.80

0.79

0.83

0.99

0.84

0.83

0.85

0.79

0.78

0.78

0.66

0.64

\(\beta \text {-}\)lactoglobulin

0.99

0.84

0.83

0.88

0.83

0.88

0.87

0.99

0.85

0.85

0.90

0.76

0.75

0.78

0.77

0.73

\(\alpha \text {-}\)lactalbumin

1.06

0.92

0.92

0.92

0.89

0.88

0.92

1.02

0.92

0.92

0.92

0.94

0.91

0.91

0.93

0.91

  1. M1: milk Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
  2. M2: herd + FTIR
  3. M3: herd + days in milk + parity + FTIR
  4. M4: herd + days in milk + parity + FTIR + Genomics
  5. M5: herd + days in milk + parity + FTIR + top three markers with the largest effects
  6. M6: herd + days in milk + parity + FTIR + Genomics + top three markers with the largest effects
  7. M7: herd + days in milk + parity + FTIR + pedigree