Further host-genomic characterization of total antibody response to PRRSV vaccination and its relationship with reproductive performance in commercial sows: genome-wide haplotype and zygosity analyses

Table 2 SNPs within significant ROH^a with dominance^b effects

ROH	SNP	P-value^c			Estimated effects^d
ROH	SNP	SNP	Add	Dom	Add	Dom
ROH1783	ALGA0033636	0.03	0.20	0.01	0.15	− 0.22 (0.08)
ROH2475	WU_10.2_5_103352361	0.005	0.02	0.04	1.26	− 0.40 (0.19)
ROH2949	ALGA0038565	0.03	0.04	0.01	− 0.23	0.16 (0.06)
ROH2949	WU_10.2_7_11285030	0.0002	0.01	0.01	− 2.30	− 1.75 (0.68)
ROH1596	WU_10.2_10_64433795	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.70	0.25 (0.23)
ROH1596	WU_10.2_10_64461127	0.04	0.03	0.02	− 0.90	1.07 (0.44)
ROH1596	WU_10.2_10_64672192	0.03	0.0	0.005	− 0.24	− 1.17 (0.44)
ROH2306	ASGA0051263	0.04	0.16	0.04	0.72	− 0.98 (0.49)

Add additive effect, Dom dominance effect
^aROH associated with sample-to-positive (S/P) ratio are presented in Table 1
^bOnly significant (P-value < 0.05) SNPs showing dominance effects (P-value < 0.05) are included in this table
^cP-values for the main effect (SNP) of SNP fitted as a categorical effect. SNPs with significant (P-value < 0.05) main effect were subjected to orthogonal contrasts analysis to test their respective additive (Add) and dominance (Dom) effects
^dEstimates for the additive (Add) and dominance (Dom) effects of each SNP. Add effects represent the effect of number of each B allele. Standard errors are between parentheses

ISSN: 1297-9686