- Open Access
Correction to: Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers
Genetics Selection Evolution volume 53, Article number: 88 (2021)
Correction to: Genet Sel Evol (2021) 53: 77 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00673-8
After the publication of the original article , the authors noticed that there was an error.
In the first paragraph of page 5, where we compare ACCLR and ACCT, the accuracy symbols have been swapped. The right sentences are: “ACCT were on average lower than ACCLR (Table 3) and more variable (Fig. 1b). This resulted in a much higher coefficient of variation for ACCT (Fig. 1c), particularly for ADG (41.06 vs. 7.79%) and OSS (37.07 vs. 10.24%).”
The related Table 3, Fig. 1 and the discussion around those results are correct.
Alexandre PA, Li Y, Hine BC, Duff CJ, Ingham AB, Porto-Neto LR, Reverter A. Bias dispersion and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers. Genet Sel Evol. 2021;53:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00673-8.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Alexandre, P.A., Li, Y., Hine, B.C. et al. Correction to: Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers. Genet Sel Evol 53, 88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00677-4