Skip to main content

Table 2 Sixty-six significant two-trait QTL for protein quantification and zootechnical traits

From: Deciphering mechanisms underlying the genetic variation of general production and liver quality traits in the overfed mule duck by pQTL analyses

APLa

Traits

Threshold

CLIP test

Proteinb

Phenotype

Location (cM)c

LRTx

Confidence intervald

biQTL

P value (%)

UniQTL1

P value (%)

UniQTL2

P value (%)

Number of markers

Hype

3

MDH1 (179)

BW12

61

27.155

48–69

0.66

2.09

3.44

29

CL

5

ALDH7A1 (300)

BWG12-42

0

23.653

0–2

0.14

0.68

4.18

1

CL

5

ACTB (159)

BWG12-42

1

18.018

0–2

1.05

3.06

4.18

1

CL

5

VCP (283)

BWG12-42

1

20.996

0–2

0.38

3.30

4.18

1

CL

5

VCP (283)

AFW

1

20.125

0–2

0.61

3.30

4.84

1

CL

6

PRDX6 (231)

LColC

1

25.817

0–18

0.44

4.41

2.18

8

–

6

MDH1 (169)

LColC

14

27.870

0–22

0.15

0.33

2.18

8

–

6

GLUD1 (319)

LL*

36

20.153

10–48

2.02

3.80

2.54

8

PL

7

PGAM1 (230)

TSW

37

33.005

32–66

0.03

4.33

0.80

12

–

7

AKR1A1 (149)

TSW

42

38.135

33–45

0.03

0.98

0.80

12

CL

7

PGAM1 (230)

BWbeg

61

26.099

44–70

0.61

4.33

4.54

12

–

7

GLUD1 (319)

TSW

63

32.601

53–70

0.11

4.16

0.80

12

–

7

GLUD1 (319)

BWbeg

65

27.396

58–70

0.40

4.16

4.54

12

–

7

APOA1 (270)

TSW

69

38.558

61–70

0.01

0.06

0.80

12

PL

7

APOA1 (270)

BWbeg

69

38.103

62–70

0.04

0.06

4.54

12

CL

8

PRPS2 (192)

Menergy

0

23.879

0–9

1.20

1.25

2.72

10

CL

8

PRDX4 (237)

Menergy

5

22.179

0–13

1.84

4.65

2.72

10

CL

9

FABP7 (318)

BW12

21

22.066

11–35

1.66

3.97

2.45

11

PL

9

HISTH4 (315)

pmSFW

80

23.876

49–83

0.81

3.84

4.06

11

CL

10

HIBCH (151)

GLU 2nd M

12

31.044

4–21

0.03

0.03

0.81

9

PL

12

PRDX6 (226)

CHO 2nd M

61

23.217

37–66

1.00

3.04

3.33

26

CL

14

PDHA1 (133)

Mb*

0

19.704

0–9

2.33

3.75

3.67

14

–

14

ADK (136)

Mb*

0

19.395

0–8

2.71

3.15

3.67

14

–

14

HIBCH (151)

TG 2nd M

40

21.241

27–69

1.34

2.93

2.44

14

–

14

HIBCH (151)

CHO 20th M

69

27.010

45–69

0.17

2.93

4.90

14

–

15

PSMC3 (116)

CHO 2nd M

29

19.869

11–40

2.63

4.38

4.94

6

CL

15

MPST (188)

CHO 2nd M

33

19.938

22–48

2.58

4.16

4.94

6

PL

15

ENO1 (124)

CHO 2nd M

35

24.632

26–50

0.63

0.73

4.94

6

CL

15

ANXA5 (207)

CHO 2nd M

35

21.660

25–48

1.52

3.25

4.94

6

–

15

CCT7 (294)

MR

40

26.662

30–48

0.29

0.56

0.77

6

CL

15

ENO1 (124)

MR

43

28.102

30–52

0.19

0.73

0.77

6

PL

15

ENO1 (112)

MR

53

24.743

44–57

0.49

1.20

0.77

6

PL

18

PGAM1(325)

CortL

0

26.128

0–37

0.53

2.27

4.86

10

–

18

PGAM1 (232)

CortL

0

27.844

0–12

0.26

1.01

4.86

10

–

18

PRDX3 (257)

CortL

5

30.485

0–12

0.15

0.43

4.86

10

–

18

MDH1 (179)

CortL

11

28.325

0–15

0.16

1.40

4.86

10

–

18

GLUL (131)

CortL

13

28.171

8–16

0.32

1.07

4.86

10

–

18

VCP (285)

CortL

17

22.468

0–37

1.85

4.52

4.86

10

–

18

GDI2 (301)

CortL

18

27.892

15–27

0.35

1.34

4.86

10

–

19

PARK7 (263)

LProtC

0

19.718

0–21

1.95

2.45

4.37

6

CL

19

EIF3I (180)

LProtC

3

20.937

0–7

1.29

1.95

4.37

6

CL

19

EIF3I (180)

CHO 2nd M

4

26.900

0–7

0.19

1.95

3.31

6

–

19

PARK7 (263)

CHO 2nd M

4

24.653

0–8

0.37

2.45

3.31

6

–

19

ACP1 (274)

CHO 2nd M

4

25.729

0–6

0.29

2.00

3.31

6

–

19

EEF2 (306)

CHO 2nd M

4

20.905

0–20

1.12

4.69

3.31

6

–

19

EIF3I (180)

BW28

4

24.539

0–12

0.38

1.95

2.71

6

PL

19

ACP1 (274)

BW28

4

22.269

0–8

0.73

2.00

2.71

6

PL

19

EIF3I (180)

BWG12-28

4

22.948

0–16

0.62

1.95

3.39

6

PL

19

ACP1 (274)

BWG12-28

4

22.473

0–8

0.82

2.00

3.39

6

PL

19

PARK7 (263)

BWG12-28

6

23.640

0–20

0.46

2.45

3.39

6

–

19

PARK7 (263)

BW28

6

23.817

0–20

0.49

2.45

2.71

6

CL

19

EEF2 (306)

BWG12-28

16

22.160

0–20

0.83

4.69

3.39

6

–

19

EEF2 (306)

BW28

33

22.876

23–41

0.64

4.69

2.71

6

PL

21

ENO1 (112)

MFmax

46

18.664

41–57

3.72

5.00

4.84

12

CL

21

HAAO (196)

MFmax

46

20.570

41–55

2.04

2.12

4.84

12

CL

21

ALB (290)

MFmax

55

20.368

44–58

0.11

4.63

4.84

12

CL

22

BPNT1 (156)

BWG28-42

0

19.784

0–10

1.17

2.67

3.87

4

–

22

PRDX4 (309)

Lb*

0

23.820

0–4

0.28

0.83

0.98

4

PL

22

CA2 (227)

BWG28-42

9

19.204

0–10

1.63

3.26

3.87

4

–

22

CA2 (227)

Lb*

9

22.351

0–10

0.51

3.26

0.98

4

–

Z

GLUD1 (319)

GLU 2nd M

7

25.930

5–11

0.29

1.13

1.22

6

PL

Z

TPI1 (236)

MpHu

23

30.798

18–34

0.01

0.63

0.29

6

PL

Z

ENO1 (144)

MpHu

23

28.755

17–35

0.06

4.84

0.29

6

CL

Z

ALDH7A1 (300)

MpHu

30

28.204

22–35

0.11

4.99

0.29

6

–

Z

PSMA1 (212)

MpHu

32

30.809

31–35

0.05

1.14

0.29

6

–

Z

ATP5B (103)

MpHu

32

27.477

31–35

0.14

2.51

0.29

6

PL

  1. Only 2t-QTL for which the P value is more significant than that of the stronger of the two QTL detected using the single-trait approach are reported in this table. These results were used to identify 16 assumed pleiotropic QTL
  2. aDuck (Anas platyrhynchos) APL chromosome or linkage group
  3. bProtein descriptions: see supplementary data
  4. cPosition on the genetic map in centiMorgans
  5. dConfidence interval in centiMorgans
  6. eCLIPtest: CL, close linkage; PL, pleiotropism; –, not tested
Back to article page

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686