Skip to main content

Table 4 The most important genomic regions and candidate genes derived from the window-based FST analyses of groups of breeds

From: Genomic diversity and signatures of selection in meat and fancy rabbit breeds based on high-density marker data

Traits

Comparison

OCU:positiona

Candidate gene

FST

Previous studiesb

Albino breeds

(Italian white + Giant White) vs all other breeds

1:127563000–127668085

TYR**

0.52

[15, 16]

15:17113617–17196501

EDNRA**

0.58

–

Silver/graying of coat

(Italian Silver + Champagne d’Argent) vs all other breeds

Un513:25550–60684

ADNP2**

0.60

–

Un0329:192475–292759

NFATC1

0.54

–

Checkered/spotted phenotype

(Checkered Giant + Rhinelander) vs all other breeds

4:67503403–67541344

KITLG

0.51

–

Dwarf/small body size

(Coloured Dwarf + Dwarf Lop + Ermine) vs all other breeds

2:8357629–8403513, 2:8404807–8620864

LCORL**, NCAPG**

0.50

[19]

18:7460895–8191494

GRID1**

0.59

–

Un0030:1681671–2068484

NTRK2**

0.54

–

Un0030:348764–635797

FRMD3**

0.57

–

7:115660028–115662696

HOXD

0.40*

[19]

13:61054286–61261797

COL11A1

0.42*

[19]

Large body size

(Checkered Giant + Giant Grey + Giant White) vs all other breeds

12:45671510–45793930; 12:45977386–46101862

BMP5**, COL21A1**

0.64

–

16:82626965–83800640, 16:53149315–53161403

CDH13**, SLC30A10

0.57

–

2:39527266–39938880

MSRA**

0.53

–

4:44715759–44848250

HMGA2**

0.40*

[19]

Meat production

Meat rabbit lines (Italian Silver + Italian Spotted + Italian White) vs all other breeds

2:158326199–158338803

MRPL33**

0.57

–

15:58389801–59653895

CCSER1**

0.52

–

9:49249318–49360593

PTPN2**

0.51

–

Un0030:1681671–2068484

NTRK2

0.49

–

  1. aPosition of the candidate gene, in bp, on the O. cuniculus reference genome (OryCun2.0). OCU: Oryctolagus cuniculus chromosome
  2. bCandidate genes previously reported in other studies in rabbit
  3. *Top 70 windows; all other FST results are from the top 14 windows containing the reported candidate gene
  4. **Relevant genes have been identified based on FST window-based analysis and single marker-based analysis (see Additional file 3: Table S21)