Table 3 Correlations between the GEBV from the different models for four traits
From: Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available
Models compared | Live weight | Hip height | BCS | Heifer puberty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Correlation | ||||
BREEDFIXED – BREEDRANDOM | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
BREEDFIXED – NOBREED | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
BREEDFIXED – BAYESR | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
BREEDRANDOM – NOBREED | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
BREEDRANDOM – BAYESR | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
NOBREED – BAYESR | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
Regression (first model GEBV on second model GEBV) | ||||
BREEDFIXED – BREEDRANDOM | 1.21 | 1.01 | 1.06 | 1.20 |
BREEDFIXED – NOBREED | 1.21 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.21 |
BREEDFIXED – BAYESR | 1.21 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.20 |
BREEDRANDOM – NOBREED | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
BREEDRANDOM – BAYESR | 1.01 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 1.00 |
NOBREED – BAYESR | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.99 |