Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of the genomic prediction scenarios evaluated for foot angle (FA) and claw set (CS) in Australian (AU) and United States (US) Angus cattle

From: Across-country genetic and genomic analyses of foot score traits in American and Australian Angus cattle

Abbreviation

Description

Scenarios

NTOT

Target

WC-TT

Within-country two-trait model

FAUS.WC

44,421

2020a:4142

Single-country analysis (no correlation between US and AU traits) for FA and CS (FA and CS are correlated traits)

CSUS.WC

46,408

2020:4429

FAAU.WC

70,464

2020:325

  

2019:3678

CSAU.WC

70,909

2020:339

  

2019:3675

MC-TT

Multi-country two-trait model

FAUS.MC

44,421

20203:4142

Two-country and two traits (FA and CS from US and AU are correlated) model

CSUS.MC

46,408

2020:4429

FAAU.MC

70,464

2020:325

  

2019:3678

CSAU.MC

70,909

2020:339

  

2019:3675

JC-TT

Joint countries two-trait model

FAJC

114,885

2020:4467

Single-trait analysis in which the phenotypic records for each trait (FA and CS) from both countries were combined as if the US and AU were the same population (FA and CS are correlated)

  

2019:3678

CSJC

117,317

2020:4768

  

2019:3675

AC

Across-country two-trait model

FAAC-EsetUS.TargetAU

44,421

2020:325

Across-country analysis for FA and CS (FA and CS are correlated traits). In this case, two scenarios:

  

2019:3678

(1) Genomic model predicting AU and Canadian Angus (CA) (AU and CA are the prediction target—Target) based on genomic and phenotypic information from US animals (US is the Training estimation set—Eset)

FAAC-EsetUS.TargetCA

44,421

700

(2) Genomic model predicting US and CA (US and CA are the Target) based on a genomic and phenotypic information from AU animals (AU is the Eset)

FAAC-EsetAU.TargetUS

70,464

2020:4142

FAAC-EsetAU.TargetCA

70,464

700

CSAC-EsetUS.TargetAU

46,408

2020:339

  

2019:3675

CSAC-EsetUS.TargetCA

46,408

700

CSAC-EsetAU.TargetUS

70,909

2020:4429

CSAC-EsetAU.TargetCA

70,909

700

  1. For the target population numbers presented in this table, all the target animals had both phenotypic and genotypic information. Furthermore, for the purpose of the forward validation, the remaining animals born in 2020 for US or in 2019–20 for AU with phenotype and no genotype were removed from the partial-dataset analyses to avoid biasing the results
  2. NTOT : number of animals included in the whole-dataset analyses; Target: animals in the target population, in which their phenotypic records were masked in the partial-dataset analyses
  3. aYear of birth of the target animals