Skip to main content

Table 3 List of significant windows and corresponding genes identified using the weighted FST approach

From: The demographic history and adaptation of Canarian goat breeds to environmental conditions through the use of genome-wide SNP data

Comparison

CHI

Start (bp)

End (bp)

N SNPs

W Fst

Genes

Metapopulation

6

13,500,001

14,000,000

6

0.158

ALPK1*, TIFA*, AP1AR*, C6H4orf32*

6

13,750,001

14,250,000

6

0.297

–

6

14,000,001

14,500,000

9

0.227

–

17

1,000,001

1,500,000

8

0.145

PISD, SFI1, EIF4ENIF1, DRG1, PATZ1, PIK3IP1, LIMK2, CRKL, RNF185, PLA2G3, INPP5J, SMTN, MORC2

19

33,000,001

33,500,000

11

0.160

PIGL, NCOR1, TTC19, ZSWIM7, ADORA2B, AKAP10, ULK2

PAL_MAJ

4

110,750,001

111,250,000

12

0.417

PEX1, TRNAG-CCC, GATAD1, ANKIB1, KRIT1, LRRD1, AKAP9, TRNAC-GCA

6

37,750,001

38,250,000

7

0.540

FAM184B*, DCAF16*, NCAPG*, LCORL*, TRNAC-GCA

6

111,500,001

112,000,000

7

0.420

PROM1, TAPT1, LDB2

12

57,750,001

58,250,000

9

0.456

FRY, ZAR1L, BRCA2, N4BP2L1, N4BP2L2, PDS5B

12

5,800,0001

5,850,0000

8

0.434

–

MAJ_TIN

2

99,000,001

99,500,000

8

0.198

TANC1, WDSUB1, BAZ2B, TRNAC-ACA

6

13,750,001

14,250,000

6

0.251

–

6

14,000,001

14,500,000

9

0.197

–

6

35,000,001

35,500,000

9

0.247

CCSER1, MMRN1, SNCA

19

19,000,001

19,500,000

6

0.210

NOS2, LYRM9, NLK

PAL_TIS

6

13,750,001

14,250,000

6

0.407

–

6

17,750,001

18,250,000

7

0.378

PAPSS1*

6

111,500,001

112,000,000

7

0.404

PROM1, TAPT1, LDB2

9

20,250,001

20,750,000

6

0.373

NUS1, GOPC, DCBLD1, ROS1, VGLL2

21

62,250,001

62,750,000

12

0.367

–

TIN_TIS

6

13,750,001

14,250,000

6

0.248

–

6

14,000,001

14,500,000

9

0.211

/

6

37,750,001

38,250,000

7

0.222

FAM184B*, DCAF16*, NCAPG*, LCORL*, TRNAC-GCA

11

38,000,001

38,500,000

6

0.242

EFEMP1, MIR217, MIR216B, CCDC85A

12

60,500,001

61,000,000

5

0.223

NBEA, MAB21L1, TRNAE-UUC

  1. Chromosome (CHI), start and end position, number of SNPs (N) within the windows, weighted FST with relative genes are reported. All the genes detected in each significant window using the weighted FST approach are listed, with those that overlapped between comparisons indicated in italics and those that overlapped between approaches (ROH islands and FST) indicated using the * symbol