Skip to main content

Table 4 Test statistics for all models at highest test statistic for separate parental QTL contributions

From: Detecting parent of origin and dominant QTL in a two-generation commercial poultry pedigree using variance component methodology

Chr

Pos (cM)

Model/Test†

  

add

addom

pat+mat

pat

mat

Imp

patvfull

matvfull

dom

Bodyweight

1

10

1.7

2.6

6.3

0.0

6.3**

4.6*

6.3*

0.0

0.8

4

85

5.0

5.7

5.6

5.3

0.6

0.6

0.3

5.0*

0.6

5

5

1.0

4.4

3.2

0.0

3.2

2.2

3.2

0.0

3.4*

Conformation score

1

10

1.8

1.8

5.4

0.0

5.4*

3.6*

5.4*

0.0

0.0

1

65

1.9

1.9

4.0

4.0

0.0

2.1

0.0

4.0*

0.0

4

10

4.1

10.4*

4.4

2.1

2.6

0.2

2.3

1.8

6.3*

4

85

0.1

0.5

2.6

0.0

2.6

2.5

2.6

0.0

0.4

5

30

2.8

5.7

5.5

0.1

5.4*

2.7

5.5*

0.2

5.7*

  1. * and ** indicate 5 and 2.5% chromosome wise significance under permutation analysis
  2. † separate parental contributions modelled by comparing a pat + mat model fitting separate maternal and paternal QTL effects versus no QTL (null model), add is additive QTL versus null model, addom is additive and dominant QTL versus null model, dom is additive and dominant QTL versus additive QTL model, mat and pat are maternal and paternal QTL models versus null respectively, imp test is pat + mat model versus add model.
Back to article page

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686