Skip to main content

Table 7 Frequencies of estimated probabilities of being a carrier

From: Reconstructing CNV genotypes using segregation analysis: combining pedigree information with CNV assay

Status

Pedigree

Assay

P < 0.001

P < 0.01

P < 0.05

P > 0.95

P > 0.99

P > 0.999

carrier

sire

p

0.00

0.01

0.03

0.71

0.62

0.58

carrier

sire

ps

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.88

0.85

0.80

carrier

sire

psd

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.98

0.98

0.96

carrier

progeny

p

0.00

0.01

0.03

0.56

0.52

0.50

carrier

progeny

ps

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.66

0.62

0.57

carrier

progeny

psd

0.00

0.00

0.02

0.73

0.71

0.68

carrier

dam

p

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.15

0.09

0.06

carrier

dam

ps

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.26

0.22

0.15

carrier

dam

psd

0.00

0.00

0.03

0.78

0.74

0.69

non-carrier

sire

p

0.37

0.67

0.84

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

sire

ps

0.84

0.93

0.96

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

sire

psd

0.98

0.99

0.99

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

progeny

p

0.40

0.61

0.77

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

progeny

ps

0.63

0.75

0.81

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

progeny

psd

0.80

0.83

0.90

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

dam

p

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

dam

ps

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

non-carrier

dam

psd

0.58

0.69

0.85

0.00

0.00

0.00

  1. Given actual status (carrier or non-carrier), position in pedigree (sire, dam or progeny), and assay strategy (p = progeny only, ps = progeny and sires, psd = progeny, sires and dams); the assay CV simulated and CV used in the analysis were both 3% and 16 half-sibs in each family were assayed