Table 6 Additive QTL effects and mode of imprinting for QTL showing significant imprinting effects: results from the joint design
From: Joint QTL analysis of three connected F2-crosses in pigs
Trait | SSC | Pos. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mode | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Back fat depth | 2 | 13 | 1.30 | (0.65) | 0.10 | (0.65) | -1.18 | (1.00) | 0.75 | (1.03) | -0.12 | (1.61) | -0.85 | (1.65) | nc |
7 | 83 | -1.28 | (0.64) | -3.30 | (0.67) | -0.002 | (0.99) | -2.97 | (1.05) | 1.28 | (1.59) | 5.26 | (1.67) | pat | |
17 | 74 | 2.42 | (0.67) | -0.41 | (0.70) | 3.31 | (1.11) | -1.33 | (1.19) | -5.72 | (1.74) | 1.73 | (1.85) | mat | |
Daily gain | 3 | 58 | -24.99 | (9.52) | 10.69 | (9.20) | -4.67 | (18.27) | 35.03 | (16.05) | 29.66 | (26.62) | -45.72 | (24.19) | nc |
5 | 128 | -30.74 | (9.77) | 15.29 | (10.17) | -28.06 | (16.38) | -2.62 | (16.92) | 58.80 | (25.07) | -12.67 | (25.92) | mat | |
7 | 42 | 3.98 | (9.42) | 34.75 | (10.14) | 19.17 | (15.65) | 26.04 | (16.81) | -23.15 | (23.61) | -60.79 | (25.47) | pat | |
8 | 8 | 16.73 | (10.51) | -7.26 | (10.82) | 71.24 | (17.96) | 3.81 | (18.63) | -87.97 | (27.2) | 3.45 | (28.01) | mat | |
Carcass weight | 1 | 89 | 6.08 | (1.36) | 3.22 | (1.30) | 10.41 | (2.33) | 10.12 | (2.23) | -16.49 | (3.55) | -13.33 | (3.40) | mat |
5 | 120 | -3.76 | (0.97) | 0.01 | (0.99) | -4.36 | (1.66) | -2.10 | (1.69) | 8.12 | (2.53) | 2.09 | (2.57) | mat | |
7 | 36 | 1.07 | (1.52) | 2.31 | (1.51) | 5.79 | (2.75) | 1.22 | (2.66) | -6.86 | (4.04) | -3.54 | (4.01) | nc | |
10 | 59 | 2.47 | (1.09) | -2.20 | (1.21) | 4.59 | (1.90) | -4.01 | (2.07) | -7.06 | (2.87) | 6.21 | (3.17) | mat | |
16 | 0 | 2.90 | (1.05) | -1.70 | (1.10) | 6.31 | (1.78) | -3.42 | (1.84) | -9.21 | (2.72) | 5.11 | (2.82) | mat | |