Skip to main content

Table 4 Increase in accuracy comparing MT to ST models for trait 2

From: Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods

   Scenario 1 Scenario 2
   11 2 3 4 1 2 2 3 4
Model rg 1&22 1&2 no no 1&2 2 no no no
  0.25 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00
A 0.54 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.10 0.03 0.01
  0.75 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.20 0.06 0.04
  0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01
G 0.54 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.03
  0.75 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.13 0.07 0.07
  0.25 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01
BCπ0 0.54 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.05 0.05
  0.75 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.02 0.14 0.08 0.09
BSSVS 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.04
  0.54 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 -0.01 -0.02 0.06 0.03 0.04
  0.75 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.09 0.10
  1. Differences are for scenarios 1 and 2 across generations and different values of the genetic correlation (rg) between both traits
  2. 1Generations 1, 2, 3 and 4; 2animals with phenotypes for: both traits (1&2), only trait 2 (2) or neither of the traits (no)