Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy of imputation for the pig dataset

From: A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation

   Pig99   Pig95   Pig90   Pig85   Unmapped
Category1 Count2 AI3 I24 AI3 I24 AI3 I24 AI3 I24 AI3
BothParents 51 0.98 0.77 0.99 0.92 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 0.83
SireMGS 62 0.93 0.80 0.98 0.92 0.99 0.94 0.99 0.96 0.78
DamPGS 47 0.96 0.79 0.98 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.96 0.82
Sire 45 0.89 0.78 0.97 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.97 0.78
Dam 13 0.90 0.76 0.96 0.89 0.98 0.93 0.98 0.95 0.73
Other 291 0.86 0.79 0.94 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.96 0.76
  1. 1Animals in the testing set were divided into six categories depending on their pattern of relationship to their most recent densely genotyped ancestors; the categories were: both parents genotyped (BothParents); sire and maternal grandsire (SireMGS); dam and paternal grandsire (DamPGS); sire only (Sire); dam only (Dam); and other relatives (Other); 2Count refers to the number of individuals in each category; 3AI = AlphaImpute; I24=IMPUTE2.