Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy of imputation for the pig dataset

From: A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation

  

Pig99

 

Pig95

 

Pig90

 

Pig85

 

Unmapped

Category1

Count2

AI3

I24

AI3

I24

AI3

I24

AI3

I24

AI3

BothParents

51

0.98

0.77

0.99

0.92

1.00

0.96

1.00

0.96

0.83

SireMGS

62

0.93

0.80

0.98

0.92

0.99

0.94

0.99

0.96

0.78

DamPGS

47

0.96

0.79

0.98

0.92

0.99

0.95

0.99

0.96

0.82

Sire

45

0.89

0.78

0.97

0.92

0.99

0.95

0.99

0.97

0.78

Dam

13

0.90

0.76

0.96

0.89

0.98

0.93

0.98

0.95

0.73

Other

291

0.86

0.79

0.94

0.91

0.97

0.95

0.97

0.96

0.76

  1. 1Animals in the testing set were divided into six categories depending on their pattern of relationship to their most recent densely genotyped ancestors; the categories were: both parents genotyped (BothParents); sire and maternal grandsire (SireMGS); dam and paternal grandsire (DamPGS); sire only (Sire); dam only (Dam); and other relatives (Other); 2Count refers to the number of individuals in each category; 3AI = AlphaImpute; I24=IMPUTE2.