Table 3 Native genetic representation and ΔF 10 in scenarios including a small number of genotyped exogenous individuals
From: Advantages of using molecular coancestry in the removal of introgressed genetic material
One generation of admixture | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb of exogenous individuals per generation | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
Nb of genotyped exogenous individuals per generation | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
Native genetic representation | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
ΔF 10 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.111 | 0.199 | 0.292 |
Three generations of admixture | |||||
Nb of exogenous individuals per generation | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
Nb of genotyped exogenous individuals per generation | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
Native genetic representation | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.987 | 0.957 | 0.907 |
ΔF 10 | 0.116 | 0.181 | 0.177 | 0.178 | 0.154 |
Five generations of admixture | |||||
Nb of exogenous individuals per generation | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
Nb of genotyped exogenous individuals per generation | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
Native genetic representation | 0.997 | 0.973 | 0.940 | 0.876 | 0.808 |
ΔF 10 | 0.128 | 0.131 | 0.130 | 0.119 | 0.118 |