Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of Bayes factors in the eight MCMC chains to analyse the QTLMAS XII data

From: Impact of prior specifications in a shrinkage-inducing Bayesian model for quantitative trait mapping and genomic prediction

 

MCMC chain I

    

II

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

.

0.99

0.74

0.89

0.89

0.87

0.79

0.78

B

1.00

.

0.72

0.88

0.90

0.88

0.79

0.76

C

1.00

1.00

.

0.84

0.67

0.70

0.70

0.78

D

0.86

0.86

0.93

.

0.82

0.85

0.83

0.78

E

0.84

0.83

0.95

1.02

.

0.96

0.88

0.82

F

0.87

0.86

0.98

1.04

1.03

.

0.89

0.82

G

0.72

0.71

0.77

0.83

0.85

0.84

.

0.90

H

0.68

0.68

0.73

0.80

0.81

0.81

0.98

.

  1. Pairwise comparison of the eight MCMC chains A-H by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ρ (upper right triangle) and mean ratio of the 2 × log-transformed Bayes factors in chain I vs. chain II (lower left triangle) for the 20 markers with the strongest signals of association across chains in the analysis of all chromosomes by MU.
Back to article page

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686