Skip to main content

Table 2 Within-breed imputation error rate and others parameters affecting imputation error rate

From: High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds

 

Training population size

Validation population size

Allelic imputation error rate (%)

LD level at 70 kb

Average RT/V

Dairy breeds

     

Abondance (ABO)

169

40

0.75

0.217

0.146

Brown Swiss (BSW)

79

20

1.92

0.255

0.074

Holstein (HOL)

634

154

0.73

0.255

0.078

Montbéliarde (MON)

424

106

0.51

0.196

0.116

Normande (HOR)

444

107

0.33

0.233

0.104

Simmental (SIM)

100

25

2.55

0.209

0.050

Beef breeds

     

Aubrac (AUB)

204

50

2.03

0.177

0.028

Bazadaise (BAZ)

72

17

2.07

0.239

0.038

Blonde d'Aquitaine (BLA)

262

65

1.80

0.175

0.038

Charolais (CHA)

539

133

0.68

0.176

0.018

Gasconne (GAS)

131

32

2.26

0.174

0.026

Limousine (LIM)

370

92

1.09

0.164

0.014

Parthenaise (PAR)

245

59

1.88

0.161

0.024

Rouge des Prés (RDP)

119

30

2.39

0.206

0.028

Salers (SAL)

197

49

1.27

0.213

0.024

  1. Size of the training and validation populations, within-breed imputation error rate, level of linkage disequilibrium (LD, r2)) at 70 kb and average relationship between training and validation populations (RT/V).