Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of F ROH values obtained by allowing different numbers of heterozygous SNPs

From: Estimating autozygosity from high-throughput information: effects of SNP density and genotyping errors

Breed

Source

Class

F ROH>1

F ROH>2

F ROH>4

F ROH>8

F ROH>16

Brown Swiss

50 k panel

A

0.154b

0.129ab

0.103a

0.073ab

0.039dfhi

B

.

.

.

.

0.036bceg

HD panel

C

0.151b

0.132b

0.109b

0.079c

0.042i

D

0.147a

0.128a

0.105a

0.076b

0.040gh

E

.

0.129ab

0.105a

0.075b

0.038ef

F

.

.

0.105a

0.071a

0.035cd

G

.

.

.

0.068a

0.033b

H

.

.

.

.

0.028a

Pinzgauer

50 k panel

A

0.069c

0.048ab

0.037a

0.026bc

0.014f

B

.

.

.

.

0.013ed

HD panel

C

0.062b

0.049b

0.039b

0.027d

0.014fe

D

0.060a

0.048ab

0.038ab

0.026dc

0.013fe

E

.

0.048a

0.037a

0.026bc

0.012d

F

.

.

0.036a

0.025ab

0.012c

G

.

.

.

0.024a

0.011b

H

.

.

.

.

0.008a

Tyrol Grey

50 k panel

A

0.080c

0.054a

0.042a

0.029abc

0.017df

B

.

.

.

.

0.015ce

HD panel

C

0.066b

0.052a

0.042a

0.030c

0.017f

D

0.063a

0.051a

0.041a

0.029b

0.016d

E

.

0.051a

0.040a

0.029b

0.016ed

F

.

.

0.040a

0.028ab

0.015c

G

.

.

.

0.026a

0.013b

H

.

.

.

.

0.010a

  1. Definition of Class is according to the number of heterozygous SNPs allowed within ROH length categories (see Table 2).
  2. FROH values were obtained by allowing different numbers of heterozygous SNPs in each ROH length category; different letters indicate statistical significance within the same column and breed (P < 0.05, paired t-test); P values were corrected for multiple tests using the step-down Bonferroni method of Holm [18].