Skip to main content

Table 5 Estimated variance components (±SE) from a traditional animal model ignoring IGE (model 3) 1

From: Indirect genetic effects contribute substantially to heritable variation in aggression-related traits in group-housed mink (Neovison vison)

Parameter

Neck BMS

Body BMS

Tail BMS

Total BMS

Weight (Kg)

σ ^ A 2

0.62 ± 0.15

1.06 ± 0.22

0.95 ± 0.19

7.26 ± 1.38

0.06 ± 0.015

2 ρ ^

0.28 ± 0.047

0.26 ± 0.04

0.17 ± 0.028

0.26 ± 0.04

-0.15 ± 0.09

2 ρ ^ s

0.05 ± 0.054

-0.09 ± 0.05

-0.17 ± 0.03

-0.09 ± 0.05

0.40 ± 0.19

σ ^ e m 2

1.18 ± 0.12

2.74 ± 0.22

2.31 ± 0.20

11.4 ± 1.14

0.026 ± 0.008

σ ^ e f 2

2.93 ± 0.22

3.53 ± 0.27

5.98 ± 0.34

22.4 ± 1.72

0.03 ± 0.009

3 σ ^ P 2

3.54 ± 0.11

4.95 ± 0.24

5.31 ± 0.18

31.09 ± 1.00

0.011 ± 0.005

h ^ 2

0.18 ± 0.04

0.21 ± 0.08

0.18 ± 0.036

0.23 ± 0.04

0.57 ± 0.13

c ^ 2

-

-

-

-

0.07 ± 0.05

  1. 1Model 3 was y = Xb + Z D a D  + Wg + Vg * s + e; 2although cage and cage*sex covariances were fitted, the result is expressed as the non-genetic correlation between phenotypes of cage mates, ρ ^ = σ ^ g 2 σ ^ g * s 2 + σ ^ g 2 + 0.5 σ ^ e m 2 + σ ^ e f 2 , and as the non-genetic correlation between phenotypes of cage mates of the same sex, ρ ^ s = σ ^ g * s 2 σ ^ g * s 2 + σ ^ g 2 + 0.5 σ ^ e m 2 + σ ^ e f 2 ; 3for BMS, phenotypic variance was estimated from a separate analysis using the model y = Xb + e, this was done because our objective was to present a single number for phenotypic variance and heritability, covering both sexes, since a single genetic variance was fitted covering both sexes; however, since our aim was to estimate the other model terms with the best fitting model, a separate analysis for phenotypic variance was performed; the standard errors of heritability estimates were calculated from the full model, averaging the residual variances for both sexes; c ^ 2 = σ ^ n d 2 σ ^ p 2 , σ ^ n d 2 refers to the non-genetic dam variance; c ^ 2 refers to the non-genetic maternal effect.