Skip to main content

Table 1 Relative efficiencies and mapping accuracies for different QTL effects

From: Using haplotypes for the prediction of allelic identity to fine-map QTL: characterization and properties

AIP

 

IBSmQTL

IBS m

TP

Score

IBS hap

P(IBD)

Beagle

R i , QTL =0.52

Relative efficiency

 

RMSEr.e.

0.02

0.16

0.17

0.15

0.06

0.10

0.54

 

E ̂ r.e.

0.03

0.01

0.23

0.14

0.12

0.14

0.28

  

σ ̂ r.e.

0.09

0.02

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.03

0.04

Mapping

≤57%

RMSEm.a.

0.11

0.17

0.23

0.17

0.10

0.11

0.16

 

accuracy

≤8%

RMSEm.a.

0.17

0.22

0.32

0.45

0.28

0.26

0.40

R i , QTL =0.18

Relative efficiency

 

RMSEr.e.

0.00

0.18

0.46

0.21

0.14

0.14

0.40

 

E ̂ r.e.

0.00

0.18

0.39

0.35

0.31

0.34

0.31

  

σ ̂ r.e.

0.00

0.06

0.02

0.03

0.05

0.04

0.06

Mapping

≤57%

RMSEm.a.

0.06

0.29

0.27

0.33

0.16

0.21

0.28

 

accuracy

≤8%

RMSEm.a.

0.10

0.34

0.36

0.46

0.29

0.30

0.31

R i , QTL =0.08

Relative efficiency

 

RMSEr.e.

0.00

0.76

1.00

1.00

1.04

1.04

0.72

 

E ̂ r.e.

0.00

0.24

0.35

0.33

0.31

0.37

0.34

  

σ ̂ r.e.

0.00

0.06

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.05

0.08

Mapping

≤57%

RMSEm.a.

0.13

0.66

0.58

0.54

0.51

0.58

0.55

 

accuracy

≤8%

RMSEm.a.

0.18

0.71

0.66

0.71

0.62

0.69

0.59

  1. R i , QTL : Multiallelic measure of LD between the simulated QTL and the haplotypes harboring it.
  2. ▪ RMSEr.e.: Root mean square error of θ r.e. P with respect to θ QTL (cM).
  3. E ̂ r.e. : Expected value of the matrix distance at θ r.e. P .
  4. σ ̂ r.e. : Standard error of the matrix distance at θ r.e. P .
  5. ▪ RMSEm.a.: Root mean square error of θ m.a. P with respect to θ QTL (cM).