How do introgression events shape the partitioning of diversity among breeds: a case study in sheep

Table 4 Contributions of the different breeds to genetic diversity, according to the method of Caballero and Toro [33]

Breeds	ΔGD _WS (x10³)	ΔGD _BS (x10³)	ΔGD _T (x10³)	He
Cors	−2.01	0.82	−1.19	0.76
Land	−0.48	−0.68	−1.16	0.68
BaBe	−1.04	−0.04	−1.07	0.71
Roov	1.24	−2.24	−0.99	0.61
MaTN	−1.11	0.16	−0.95	0.71
MeAr	−1.7	0.86	−0.83	0.74
MeRa	3	−3.82	−0.83	0.50
Roma	−0.99	0.26	−0.73	0.70
Lour	−1.16	0.51	−0.65	0.71
MaTR	−1.05	0.41	−0.64	0.71
Cast	−1.08	0.54	−0.54	0.71
EsLM	−1.22	0.75	−0.47	0.72
Boul	0.06	−0.43	−0.38	0.65
Griv	−1.1	0.73	−0.38	0.71
RoRo	−1.22	0.84	−0.37	0.72
Solo	1.21	−1.57	−0.36	0.59
Limo	−1.18	0.84	−0.35	0.72
Hamp	−0.27	−0.07	−0.34	0.67
Texe	−0.04	−0.28	−0.33	0.65
NoVe	−1.33	1.06	−0.27	0.72
MoNo	−0.95	0.68	−0.26	0.70
LaVG	−0.78	0.57	−0.21	0.69
Mour	−0.88	0.69	−0.19	0.70
AuCa	−0.96	0.78	−0.18	0.70
Bize	0.05	−0.22	−0.16	0.65
DoDo	−0.04	−0.06	−0.1	0.65
ThMa	−0.67	0.58	−0.1	0.69
BeIn	−0.03	−0.05	−0.08	0.66
MoCh	−0.15	0.09	−0.06	0.66
BlMc	−1.3	1.26	−0.04	0.72
IlFr	−0.12	0.09	−0.02	0.66
Prea	−1.08	1.13	0.05	0.71
Rava	−0.63	0.74	0.11	0.69
Bare	−1.13	1.27	0.15	0.72
LaVO	−1.06	1.21	0.15	0.71
LaLC	−0.8	0.97	0.17	0.69
Tara	−0.99	1.17	0.18	0.71
LaBr	2.12	−1.87	0.25	0.55
Suff	0.89	−0.56	0.33	0.61
MoVe	0.86	−0.51	0.35	0.61
LaLO	−0.39	0.85	0.46	0.67
Avra	2.62	−2.1	0.53	0.52
BeCh	2.1	−1.36	0.74	0.55
Sout	1.76	−0.92	0.84	0.57
CaLo	0.63	0.23	0.86	0.62
RoOu	0.82	0.06	0.88	0.61
Char	2.37	−1.48	0.89	0.54
Cote	2.54	−1.6	0.93	0.53
BeIl	3.42	−2.1	1.32	0.48
BlMa	1.77	−0.33	1.44	0.56
RoHa	1.47	0.14	1.61	0.58

ΔGD _WS = loss or gain of gene diversity within populations when the breed is removed; ΔGD _BS = loss or gain of gene diversity between populations when the breed is removed; ΔGD _T = loss or gain of total diversity when the breed is removed; He: non-biased expected heterozygosity

ISSN: 1297-9686