Table 2 Estimates of variance components for TC cattle: Comparison between pedigree (NRM), normalized compression distance (CRM1 and CRM2) and genomic relationship (GRM)
Model effects | Ve | Vn | Vg | Vc1 | Vc2 | Vp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. NRM | 220.1370 | 207.5774 | Â | Â | Â | 427.714 |
2. GRM | 217.4226 | Â | 212.8462 | Â | Â | 430.269 |
3. CRM1 | 195.7910 | Â | Â | 155.4020 | Â | 351.193 |
4. CRM2 | 223.5068 | Â | Â | Â | 222.1801 | 445.686 |
5. NRMÂ +Â GRM | 143.1428 | 143.7108 | 159.4054 | Â | Â | 446.259 |
6. NRMÂ +Â CRM1 | 131.0090 | 149.6712 | Â | 98.5048 | Â | 379.185 |
7. NRMÂ +Â CRM2 | 146.4022 | 146.6484 | Â | Â | 165.8576 | 458.908 |
8. GRMÂ +Â CRM1 | 127.3081 | Â | 159.2306 | 94.8720 | Â | 381.411 |
9. GRMÂ +Â CRM2 | 208.1053 | Â | 120.8427 | Â | 110.7054 | 439.653 |
10. CRM1Â +Â CRM2 | 129.0538 | Â | Â | 97.1270 | 168.0027 | 394.183 |
11. NRMÂ +Â GRMÂ +Â CRM1 | 97.5807 | 109.4418 | 122.6173 | 72.4005 | Â | 402.040 |
12. NRMÂ +Â GRMÂ +Â CRM2 | 105.9689 | 116.9839 | 122.6360 | Â | 125.9694 | 471.558 |