The Southwestern fringe of Europe as an important reservoir of caprine biodiversity

Martínez, Amparo M.; Gama, Luis T.; Delgado, Juan V.; Cañón, Javier; Amills, Marcel; de Sousa, Carolina Bruno; Ginja, Catarina; Zaragoza, Pilar; Manunza, Arianna; Landi, Vincenzo; Sevane, Natalia

doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0167-8

Genetics Selection Evolution

Table 1 Genetic diversity parameters estimated with 20 microsatellite loci in 29 Portuguese and Spanish goat populations

From: The Southwestern fringe of Europe as an important reservoir of caprine biodiversity

Population	Acronym	N/Herds	Census	MNA	Ar^f	H_e ± SD	H_o ± SD	F_IS	NA	HWEd
Spain
Pirenaica^a	PIR	18/4	1627^d	6.60 ± 2.50	5.49	0.695 ± 0.043	0.654 ± 0.027	0.061	0.041	0
Moncaína^a	MON	32/5	2693^d	7.10 ± 3.09	5.34	0.687 ± 0.048	0.626 ± 0.020	0.091*	0.048	2
Azpi Gorri^a	AZ	40/13	1607^d	6.70 ± 2.81	4.71	0.659 ± 0.039	0.634 ± 0.017	0.039	0.024	0
Blanca de Rasquera^a	RAS	40/5	5000^d	6.25 ± 2.81	4.57	0.634 ± 0.050	0.586 ± 0.017	0.077*	0.040	1
Guadarrama	GUAD	11/3	9212^d	4.50 ± 2.21	–	0.611 ± 0.062	0.551 ± 0.038	0.105	0.039	0
Retinta	RET	15/3	2307^d	5.61 ± 2.40	–	0.688 ± 0.042	0.677 ± 0.029	0.017	0.026	0
Verata	VERA	28/5	8738^d	6.50 ± 2.54	4.78	0.654 ± 0.045	0.537 ± 0.022	0.182*	0.077	3
Blanca Andaluza	BLANCA	40/6	8642^d	6.65 ± 2.62	4.93	0.665 ± 0.041	0.631 ± 0.017	0.052	0.031	0
Celtibérica	CELTIB	40/6	7904^d	7.15 ± 2.66	5.01	0.663 ± 0.042	0.621 ± 0.017	0.064	0.030	0
Blanca Celtibérica	BC	30/4	<100	6.55 ± 2.26	4.90	0.652 ± 0.044	0.574 ± 0.021	0.123*	0.064	0
Malagueña	MALAG	40/15	40,872^d	6.80 ± 2.88	5.06	0.683 ± 0.041	0.627 ± 0.017	0.083*	0.042	0
Murciano-Granadina	MG	40/15	99,335^d	6.6 0 ± 2.37	4.96	0.655 ± 0.049	0.615 ± 0.017	0.062*	0.031	0
Florida	FLO	40/19	24,249^d	7.25 ± 3.01	5.22	0.697 ± 0.036	0.666 ± 0.017	0.045	0.024	0
Payoya	PAY	36/5	6905^d	6.40 ± 3.14	4.89	0.672 ± 0.041	0.674 ± 0.017	−0.003	0.024	0
Negra Serrana	SER	40/5	4715^d	6.35 ± 2.62	4.62	0.657 ± 0.037	0.605 ± 0.017	0.080*	0.045	3
Formentera^b	FOR	11/3	225^d,g	4.20 ± 1.61	4.04	0.598 ± 0.051	0.558 ± 0.034	0.070	0.035	0
Pitiusa^b	IB	40/10	225^d,g	6.35 ± 2.39	4.71	0.652 ± 0.045	0.573 ± 0.017	0.124*	0.061	1
Mallorquina^b	MALL	40/10	236^d	6.80 ± 2.61	4.77	0.649 ± 0.040	0.600 ± 0.017	0.077*	0.047	1
Ajuí^c	AJ	40/-	1700^d	5.85 ± 2.28	4.44	0.651 ± 0.029	0.618 ± 0.017	0.052	0.034	1
Majorera^c	MFV	40/10	12,832^d	6.60 ± 2.89	4.63	0.637 ± 0.038	0.612 ± 0.017	0.039	0.027	0
Palmera^c	PAL	40/5	9158^d	4.15 ± 1.53	3.24	0.497 ± 0.038	0.507 ± 0.018	−0.020	0.020	0
Tenerife Norte^c	TFN	40/5	4705^d,g	5.30 ± 2.47	4.04	0.603 ± 0.037	0.588 ± 0.018	0.026	0.031	0
Tenerife Sur^c	TFS	40/8	4705^d,g	6.00 ± 2.58	4.16	0.595 ± 0.037	0.590 ± 0.017	0.009	0.012	0
Portugal
Bravia	BR	39/39	9768^e	5.95 ± 2.54	4.31	0.632 ± 0.046	0.621 ± 0.017	0.017	0.018	0
Serpentina	SP	30/17	4816^e	6.80 ± 3.21	4.94	0.671 ± 0.045	0.618 ± 0.020	0.080*	0.043	0
Algarvia	AL	30/29	3991^e	6.35 ± 2.62	4.75	0.681 ± 0.036	0.647 ± 0.020	0.052	0.036	0
Charnequeira	CH	29/10	4403^e	6.40 ± 2.33	4.94	0.685 ± 0.034	0.655 ± 0.020	0.044	0.038	0
Serrana	SR	29/26	18,607^e	6.90 ± 2.83	5.00	0.674 ± 0.042	0.601 ± 0.020	0.110*	0.049	1
Preta de Montesinho	PM	37/13	707^e	6.75 ± 2.79	4.84	0.669 ± 0.043	0.563 ± 0.019	0.160*	0.068	1
Average		34		6.24	4.71	0.65	0.61	0.039

N/Herds sample size and herds, MNA mean number of alleles, Ar allelic richness, H _e expected heterozygosity, H _o observed heterozygosity, SD standard deviation, F _IS within-breed inbreeding coefficient and significance (* P < 0.001), NA frequency of null alleles, HWEd number of loci not complying with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within-breed (P < 0.001)
^aBreeds from the Pyrenean area
^bBreeds from the Balearic Islands
^cBreeds from the Canary Islands
^d https://aplicaciones.magrama.es/arca-webapp/flujos.html?_flowId=catalogoRazas-flow&_flowExecutionKey=e1s (Census at 12/31/2014 considering registered animals)
^e http://www.dgv.min-agricultura.pt/xeov21/attachfileu.jsp?look_parentBoui=3820310&att_display=n&att_download=y (Census at 12/31/2014 considering registered animals)
^fAllelic richness per locus and population was based on a minimum sample size of nine diploid individuals. The amount of data was not sufficient to calculate allelic richness for Guadarrama and Retinta breeds
^gBoth populations are registered in the same herdbook

Back to article page

ISSN: 1297-9686

Contact us

Submission enquiries: helene.hayes@inrae.fr
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com