Whole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection

Table 4 Rate of inbreeding for conservation (cons) strategy, based on different types of estimated relationships

Restriction	Data type and estimator	ΔF_A	ΔF_SNP_Yang	ΔF_SNP_Similarity	ΔF_WGS_Yang	ΔF_WGS_Similarity
No restriction	A	−0.015	0.013	−0.007	0.012	−0.013
	SNP_Yang	0.002	0.002	0.002	0.002	0.002
	SNP_Similarity	0.002	0.018	−0.020	0.017	−0.021
	WGS_Yang	0.002	0.002	0.002	0.002	0.003
	WGS_Similarity	−0.003	0.018	−0.013	0.019	− *0.031*
20 selected	A	−0.003	0.038	0.004	0.035	−0.006
	SNP_Yang	0.028	0.015	0.012	0.016	0.009
	SNP_Similarity	0.008	0.027	−0.011	0.025	−0.015
	WGS_Yang	0.027	0.015	0.013	0.015	0.012
	WGS_Similarity	0.007	0.030	−0.002	0.030	− *0.023*
10 selected	A	0.019	0.064	0.031	0.059	0.023
	SNP_Yang	0.048	0.033	0.026	0.034	0.032
	SNP_Similarity	0.034	0.047	0.005	0.046	−0.002
	WGS_Yang	0.048	0.034	0.030	0.034	0.024
	WGS_Similarity	0.032	0.053	0.011	0.052	− *0.006*
5 selected	A	0.069	0.118	0.092	0.108	0.084
	SNP_Yang	0.107	0.073	0.073	0.073	0.070
	SNP_Similarity	0.090	0.088	0.038	0.087	0.034
	WGS_Yang	0.094	0.074	0.065	0.075	0.061
	WGS_Similarity	0.090	0.091	0.041	0.089	*0.029*

The lowest estimated rates of inbreeding calculated from each type of estimated relationship matrix depending on the scenario are in italics. The overall lowest value of estimated rate of inbreeding is in italic bold

ISSN: 1297-9686