Skip to main content

Table 3 Phenotypic and genetic evolution of the population over 20 years for the parameter setups with an initial negative direct-maternal correlation

From: A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance

Selection strategy

Setup

\(n_{D}\)

F (%)

\(\frac{{P_{{[ {24} ]}} }}{{\sigma_{P} }}\)

\(\frac{{BV_{dir}^{{Q_{{[ {23} ]}} }} }}{{\sigma_{{BV_{dir} }} }}\)

\(\frac{{BV_{mat}^{{Q_{{[ {23} ]}} }} }}{{\sigma_{{BV_{mat} }} }}\)

\(V\left( {P_{{[ {24} ]}} } \right)\)

\(V\left( {BV_{dir}^{{Q_{{[ {23} ]}} }} } \right)\)

\(V\left( {BV_{mat}^{{Q_{{[ {23} ]}} }} } \right)\)

\(r_{{BV_{dir} , BV_{{mat_{{[ {23} ]}} }} }}\)

L

3

1

26.11 (3.18)

2.42 (0.39)

4.41 (0.79)

0.75 (0.74)

37.35 (6.15)

5.67 (3.06)

6.16 (3.20)

− 0.491 (0.240)

8

18.83 (2.38)

2.69 (0.35)

2.11 (0.66)

3.26 (0.64)

37.01 (5.64)

6.99 (2.43)

6.97 (2.51)

− 0.525 (0.148)

4

1

26.47 (2.89)

3.79 (0.44)

6.31 (0.81)

− 0.35 (0.79)

40.93 (6.09)

11.11 (4.63)

5.57 (2.44)

− 0.461 (0.219)

8

20.45 (2.56)

3.85 (0.42)

3.92 (0.68)

2.18 (0.68)

38.69 (5.22)

13.38 (3.93)

6.87 (2.11)

− 0.526 (0.155)

M

3

1

35.42 (4.93)

3.07 (0.41)

4.02 (0.98)

2.43 (0.98)

36.08 (5.00)

5.03 (2.59)

5.15 (2.67)

− 0.528 (0.217)

8

24.41 (3.63)

3.29 (0.37)

2.02 (0.75)

4.51 (0.75)

35.89 (4.68)

6.10 (1.99)

6.37 (1.86)

− 0.518 (0.131)

4

1

36.90 (4.17)

4.44 (0.48)

6.45 (0.83)

0.95 (0.88)

39.43 (5.90)

9.22 (4.10)

4.88 (2.37)

− 0.503 (0.232)

8

25.41 (3.47)

4.44 (0.46)

4.05 (0.71)

3.14 (0.70)

37.68 (5.15)

12.52 (4.04)

6.13 (2.05)

− 0.522 (0.141)

  1. Values in brackets represent sampling standard deviations over 160 replicates
  2. Parameter setups 3 and 4 are fully described in Table 1. In setup 3, direct (\(dir\)) and maternal (\(mat\)) genetic variances in the base population are equal, while in parameter setup 4, \(\sigma_{{BV_{dir} }}^{2} = 2 \cdot \sigma_{{BV_{mat} }}^{2}\). In both setups, the direct-maternal genetic correlation in the base population equals − 0.5.
  3. L is within-maternal-line selection; M is mass selection; \(n_{D}\) is the number of drones mating each queen; F is the inbreeding coefficient; \(\frac{{P_{{\left[ {24} \right]}} }}{{\sigma_{P} }}\) is the standardized performance of colonies in year 24; \(\frac{{BV_{dir}^{{Q_{{\left[ {23} \right]}} }} }}{{\sigma_{{BV_{dir} }} }}\) and \(\frac{{BV_{mat}^{{Q_{{\left[ {23} \right]}} }} }}{{\sigma_{{BV_{mat} }} }}\) are the direct and maternal standardized breeding values of queens born in year 23, respectively; \(V\left( {P_{{\left[ {24} \right]}} } \right)\) is the phenotypic variance of colonies performing in year 24; \(V\left( {BV_{dir}^{{Q_{23} }} } \right)\) and \(V\left( {BV_{mat}^{{Q_{23} }} } \right)\) are the direct and maternal genetic variances of queens born in year 23; \(r_{{BV_{dir} , BV_{{mat_{{\left[ {23} \right]}} }} }}\) is the genetic correlation between direct and maternal effects from queens born in year 23.