Skip to main content

Table 1 Data used in subsequent ssGBLUPa evaluations following each preselection scenario, after quality control

From: Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs

Data in the subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation/preselection scenario

With records on animals in the validation generation

Without records on animals in the validation generation

Referenceb

VGPc

MGPd

Referenceb

VGPc

MGPd

Sire line (number of validation animals per trait is ± 1383)

 Number of animals in the pedigree

81,875

60,950

12,777

81,875

60,950

12,777

 Number of animals with record for at least one traite

75,129

54,217

6065

52,846

52,846

4694

 Number of animals with genotypes

33,506

23,315

5131

33,506

23,315

5131

 Number of SNP genotyped

20,550

20,963

20,926

20,550

20,963

20,926

Dam line (number of validation animals per trait is ± 2051)

 Number of animals in the pedigree

160,426

124,031

33,485

160,426

124,031

33,485

 Number of animals with record for at least one trait

139,403

103,018

12,514

100,710

100,710

10,206

 Number of animals with genotypes

50,895

36,369

9072

50,895

36,369

9072

 Number of SNP genotyped

19,199

19,256

20,647

19,199

19,256

20,647

  1. aSingle-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
  2. bIn the reference scenario, the subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation used the entire available data until the validation generation
  3. cValidation generation preselection (VGP) scenario, in which all animals in the validation generation without progeny in the data were discarded
  4. dMulti-generation preselection (MGP) scenario, in which all animals in the validation and training generations without progeny in the data were discarded
  5. eAbout 87% and 70% of the animals in the sire and dam lines, respectively, had records for the four traits used in this study, and even larger numbers had records for any two and three traits. We decided to keep any animal with a record for at least one of the traits (92% and 87% of the animals in the sire and dam lines, respectively) because every animal in the analyses would benefit from records on relatives and records of correlated traits (see Additional file 1: Table S1), in addition to its own record on the primary trait