Mottet A, De Haan C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Opio C, Gerber P. Livestock: on our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Glob Food Secur. 2017;14:1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Layman DK. Assessing the role of cattle in sustainable food systems. Nutr Today. 2018;53:160–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Gerber PJ, Mottet A, Opio CI, Falcucci A, Teillard F. Environmental impacts of beef production: review of challenges and perspectives for durability. Meat Sci. 2015;109:2–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Lamy E, van Harten S, Sales-Baptista E, Guerra MM, Almeida AM. Factors influencing livestock productivity. In: Sejian V, Naqvi SMK, Ezeji T, Lakritz J, Rattan L, editors. Environmental stress and amelioration in livestock production. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 19–51.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Poppi DP, Quigley SP, da Silva TACC, McLennan SR. Challenges of beef cattle production from tropical pastures. R Bras Zootec. 2018;47:e20160419.
Article
Google Scholar
Carvalheiro R, Hayes BJ, Albuquerque LG, Moore S. Genetic sensitivity of beef cattle to environmental variation. In: Hermesch S, Dominik S, editors. Breeding focus 2018—reducing heat stress. Armidale: Anim Genet Breed Unit; 2018. p. 17–29.
Google Scholar
Falconer D. Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet Res. 1990;56:57–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick M, Lofsvold D, Bulmer M. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics. 1990;124:979–93.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bradford HL, Fragomeni BO, Bertrand JK, Lourenco DAL, Misztal I. Genetic evaluations for growth heat tolerance in Angus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2016;94:4143–50.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ravagnolo O, Misztal I. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter estimation. J Dairy Sci. 2000;83:2126–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nguyen TTT, Bowman PJ, Haile-Mariam M, Pryce JE, Hayes BJ. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:2849–62.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Schaeffer LR. Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livest Prod Sci. 2004;86:35–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Lillehammer M, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen TH, Goddard ME. Gene by environment interactions for production traits in Australian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:4008–17.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Savin K, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, et al. A validated genome wide association study to breed cattle adapted to an environment altered by climate change. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6676.
Article
Google Scholar
Silva FF, Mulder HA, Knol EF, Lopes MS, Guimarães SEF, Lopes PS, et al. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:3825–34.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Burrow HM. Importance of adaptation and genotype x environment interactions in tropical beef breeding systems. Animal. 2012;6:729–40.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Pérez-Enciso M, Rincón JC, Legarra A. Sequence vs. chip-assisted genomic selection: accurate biological information is advised. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:43.
Article
Google Scholar
MacLeod IM, Bowman PJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Haile-Mariam M, Kemper KE, Chamberlain AJ, et al. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:144.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel FS. A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:478.
Article
Google Scholar
Carvalheiro R, Boison SA, Neves HHR, Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS, Utsunomiya YT, et al. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nellore cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:69.
Article
Google Scholar
Calus MP, Groen AF, de Jong G. Genotype x environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:3115–23.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Henderson CR. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph: University of Guelph; 1984.
Google Scholar
Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM. Robust regression and outlier detection. Hokoben: Wiley; 2003.
Google Scholar
Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Goddard ME. Models for genome x environment interaction: examples in livestock. Crop Sci. 2016;56:2251–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Foulley JL, Quaas RL. Heterogeneous variances in Gaussian linear mixed models. Genet Select Evol. 1995;27:211–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Lourenco D, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Vitezica Z. Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs. 2016. http://nce.ads.uga.edu/wiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=blupf90_all2.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.
Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control. 1974;19:716–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6:461–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang H, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Muir WM. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes. Genet Res (Camb). 2012;94:73–83.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Stranden I, Garrick DJ. Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2971–5.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:743–52.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414–23.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zerbino DR, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Amode MR, Barrell D, Bhai J, et al. Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D754–61.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zimin AV, Delcher AL, Florea L, Kelley DR, Schatz MC, Puiu D, et al. A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R42.
Article
Google Scholar
Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1826.
Article
Google Scholar
The GTEx Consortium. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348:648–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Chiaia HLJ, de Lemos MVA, Venturini GC, Aboujaoude C, Berton MP, Feitosa FB, et al. Genotype x environment interaction for age at first calving, scrotal circumference, and yearling weight in Nellore cattle using reaction norms in multitrait random regression models. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:1503–10.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Santana ML Jr, Eler JP, Bignardi AB, Menendez-Buxadera A, Cardoso FF, Ferraz JBS. Multi-trait linear reaction norm model to describe the pattern of phenotypic expression of some economic traits in beef cattle across a range of environments. J Appl Genet. 2015;56:219–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Oliveira DP, Lourenco DAL, Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Santos DJA, de Araújo Neto FR, et al. Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation. J Anim Sci. 2018;96:27–34.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Su G, Madsen P, Lund MS, Sorensen D, Korsgaard IR, Jensen J. Bayesian analysis of the linear reaction norm model with unknown covariates. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:1651–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cardoso FF, Tempelman RJ. Linear reaction norm models for genetic merit prediction of Angus cattle under genotype by environment interaction. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2130–41.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cardoso LL, Neto JB, Cardoso FF, Cobuci JA, Biassus IO, Barcellos JOJ. Hierarchical Bayesian models for genotype × environment estimates in post-weaning gain of Hereford bovine via reaction norms. R Bras Zootec. 2011;40:294–300.
Article
Google Scholar
Streit M, Reinhardt F, Thaller G, Bennewitz J. Reaction norms and genotype-by-environment interaction in the German Holstein dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 2012;129:380–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
MohanKumar SMJ, Balasubramanian P, Dharmaraj M, MohanKumar PS. Neuroendocrine regulation of adaptive mechanisms in livestock. In: Sejian V, Naqvi SMK, Ezeji T, Lakritz J, Rattan L, editors. Environmental stress and amelioration in livestock production. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 263–98.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Lai Y, Li D, Li C, Muehleisen B, Radek KA, Park HJ, et al. The antimicrobial protein REG3A regulates keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation after skin injury. Immunity. 2012;37:74–84.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mukherjee S, Hooper LV. Antimicrobial defense of the intestine. Immunity. 2015;42:28–39.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cash HL, Whitham CV, Behrendt CL, Hooper LV. Symbiotic bacteria direct expression of an intestinal bactericidal lectin. Science. 2006;313:1126–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Steele MA, Penner GB, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Guan LL. Development and physiology of the rumen and the lower gut: targets for improving gut health. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:4955–66.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Chung LK, Raffatellu M. G.I.pros: antimicrobial defense in the gastrointestinal tract. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;88:129–37.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang S, Albornoz RI, Aschenbach JR, Barreda DR, Penner GB. Short-term feed restriction impairs the absorptive function of the reticulo-rumen and total tract barrier function in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:1685–95.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang MD, Dzama K, Hefer CA, Muchadeyi FC. Genomic population structure and prevalence of copy number variations in South African Nguni cattle. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:894.
Article
Google Scholar
McKenzie GJ, Bancroft A, Grencis RK, McKenzie AN. A distinct role for interleukin-13 in Th2-cell-mediated immune responses. Curr Biol. 1998;8:339–42.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buitkamp J, Jann O, Fries R. The cattle interleukin-13 gene: genomic organization, chromosomal location, and evolution of the promoter. Immunogenetics. 1999;49:872–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Trigona WL, Brown WC, Estes DM. Functional implications for signaling via the IL4R/IL13R complex on bovine cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1999;72:73–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Woods AM, Judd AM. Interleukin-4 increases cortisol release and decreases adrenal androgen release from bovine adrenal cells. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2008;34:372–82.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zoico E, Roubenoff R. The role of cytokines in regulating protein metabolism and muscle function. Nutr Rev. 2002;60:39–51.
Article
Google Scholar
Matarese G, La Cava A. The intricate interface between immune system and metabolism. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:193–200.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Odegaard JI, Chawla A. The immune system as a sensor of the metabolic state. Immunity. 2013;38:644–54.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Queitsch C, Sangster TA, Lindquist S. Hsp90 is a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;417:618–24.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sangster TA, Salathia N, Undurraga S, Milo R, Schellenberg K, Lindquist S, et al. HSP90 affects the expression of genetic variation and developmental stability in quantitative traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2963–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bahbahani H, Tijjani A, Mukasa C, Wragg D, Almathen F, Nash O, et al. Signatures of selection for environmental adaptation and Zebu × Taurine hybrid fitness in East African Shorthorn Zebu. Front Genet. 2017;8:68.
Article
Google Scholar
Macciotta NPP, Biffani S, Bernabucci U, Lacetera N, Vitali A, Ajmone-Marsan P, et al. Derivation and genome-wide association study of a principal component-based measure of heat tolerance in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100:4683–97.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sanders MM, Kon C. Glutamine is a powerful effector of heat shock protein expression in Drosophila Kc cells. J Cell Physiol. 1991;146:180–90.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Boj SF, van Es JH, Huch M, Li VS, José A, Hatzis P, et al. Diabetes risk gene and Wnt effector Tcf7l2/TCF4 controls hepatic response to perinatal and adult metabolic demand. Cell. 2012;151:1595–607.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Haase H, Rink L. Multiple impacts of zinc on immune function. Metallomics. 2014;6:1175–80.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ticianelli JS, Emanuelli IP, Satrapa RA, Castilho ACS, Loureiro B, Sudano MJ, et al. Gene expression profile in heat-shocked Holstein and Nelore oocytes and cumulus cells. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;29:1787–802.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Franzin AM, Maruyama SR, Garcia GR, Oliveira RP, Ribeiro JMC, Bishop R, et al. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:51.
Article
Google Scholar
Roth S, Rottach A, Lotz-Havla AS, Laux V, Muschaweckh A, Gersting SW, et al. Rad50-CARD9 interactions link cytosolic DNA sensing to IL-1β production. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:538–45.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Yurchenko AA, Daetwyler HD, Yudin N, Schnabel RD, Vander Jagt CJ, Soloshenko V, et al. Scans for signatures of selection in Russian cattle breed genomes reveal new candidate genes for environmental adaptation and acclimation. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12984.
Article
Google Scholar